Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve kelly who wrote (43806)	3/14/1999 11:53:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53903

>>IDC data showed that Korea's emergence as the uncontested leader in the worldwide DRAM market is largely due to the strong performance of Hyundai Electronics Industries, the chip manufacturing arm of Korea's largest conglomerate. HEI's market share jumped by an annualized 4.4 percent to 12.4 percent last year, second only to Samsung Electronics, which maintained the top spot with a 20.1 percent market share in the same period.<< painvestor, didn't you say hyundai was toast? seems hyundai didn't believe you. in fact, this result makes me wonder about that agenda issue i brought up before. you were wrong on hyundai. >>LG Semicon, another Korean DRAM maker, edged up a notch in the rankings to fifth, grabbing an 8.4 percent market share last year, and contributing to the nation's success in becoming the largest DRAM chip supplier in the world.<< not bad for a company that can't compete ;-) >>Micron Technology of the United States was third with 9.2 percent, followed by Japan's NEC with 9.1 percent, LG Semicon, Toshiba with 7.9 percent, Siemens with 7.8 percent and Mitsubishi with 6.9 percent. Hitachi with 6.5 percent and Fujitsu with 5.9 percent rounded out the top ten.<< hey, mu only has .8% more than lg. .8% more than a company that can't compete? and mu is great and lg sucks? ho ho ho ho ho ho! el biaso extraordinaire-o! what happened to that 16% mu bragged about? does the 9.2% of mu's share take into account the 10% DECLINE in bit output last q that they so poorly tried to hide from the slow wits that own their stock (as opposed to trade this nonsense)? ;-)