SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jan Crawley who wrote (45727)3/15/1999 2:31:00 AM
From: H James Morris  Respond to of 164684
 
>>The reason? At a bank already shaken by scandal, managers in the unit were under heavy pressure to meet performance targets. All told, they had illegally tapped $19.1 million in funds belonging to beneficiaries of retirement plans and holders of securities, among others.<<
Jan this happened @ Bankers trust. I'm sure glad it didn't happen @ CitiBank? The article goes on to say that the fraud was caused by management trying to meet the analyst's expectations.
Oh no! One of the elephants was MS!!!



To: Jan Crawley who wrote (45727)3/15/1999 7:28:00 AM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
Jan,

>> 2. The options activities suggest average interest, more callers than put holders. Amzn needs more option support to push the price up.
<<

Also, amzn is now near the high point in the past 30 thirty days. Which means nearly all the outstanding puts are worthless, but nearly all the calls are in the money. I wonder what the max pain point is now. It is probably around 120.



To: Jan Crawley who wrote (45727)3/15/1999 9:07:00 AM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 164684
 
Hi Jan,

What are you going to do this morning re amzn? I will sell 100 into the open if I can get 136 or close to it.