Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Valkyrie who wrote (28956)	3/15/1999 1:56:00 PM
From: jhild	Respond to of 43774

Well looky there, Donald adopting the LegalBoy defense. Too lazy to go look it up for yourself, but not so lazy to take potshots in a drive-by posting.

To: Valkyrie who wrote (28956)	3/15/1999 2:34:00 PM
From: ColleenB	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

donald, perhaps you should read some of the exchanges more carefully. Linda was caught with his pants down. He insisted that jhild lied about Carl's supposed involvement in the case cited...... to quote Linda, in a post to jhild..... The truth is that you are a LIAR, you have posted FRAUDULENT information which you personally fabricated knowing very well that it was FRAUDULENT. #reply-7950978 but when I asked for the post where he insists that jhild altered the document and added Carl's name, he came up blank. Here's what Linda had to say to me..... Then when I asked him for the cite of the case, he deliberately changed the names of the litigants.#reply-8296115 In fact, I found evidence quite the contrary. To cover his behind, he started making up fictitious quotes, to which he was caught on also. He then cracked under cross examination and posted several private messages in an attempt to change the subject matter at hand, which was that he had soiled himself and had been discovered. And, well... if you're looking for an excuse to pat LindaBeast on the back and say he had a right because I asked for the information to be posted, well there is none coming. In fact, here is EXACTLY what he was insisting he had on me... in a post to me... Colleen, this is testimony under oath: You said to me in a PM that you sold all of your stock before the price dropped under 5c. now, donald... this is what I objected to. This is NOT a fact so I knew there was no way I could have said such a thing. I knew THIS statement to be a LIE. And guess what donald, the last time the stock closed ABOVE a nickle was July 28th, and it closed at .052. and here's another one..... As I recall Colleen, you PMed me with a statement that you had all sorts of bad stuff of PRWT. I asked you for whatever you had so that we could research it, but you never came through with anything. #reply-8296115 I never came through with anything but yet he produces SEVERAL exchanges we had, one sided might I add. Guess he wasn't man enough to post his side of the conversation. So, you make all the excuses for Linda that you can, he needs them. because... The truth is that he is a LIAR, posted FRAUDULENT information which he knew to be FRAUDULENT and tried to cover his butt by throwing up a smoke screen.