Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLFM - Undervalued with great potential -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard B who wrote (7381)	3/15/1999 1:49:00 PM
From: Bruce A. Thompson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 9096

Richard, Dismissed, MY BUTT!!!!! We have grounds to sue their company into next week. To accuse someone of owing a debt in public without a "Judgement" by a court of law is against the law and an unfair trade practice. Not to mention, that if PLFM can prove their side in court, then it becomes libel and or slander. This has got to be a hoax. First of all, nobody is going to PR a $5,000 debt. The risks are so much higher than the rewards so it just doesn't make sense. If the post were true, then they would be bound now to sue, even if they did get paid since to not prove their allegation would again be slander. Any attorneys out there want this case? BT