SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gg cox who wrote (15840)3/15/1999 2:24:00 PM
From: mineman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
Evidence now is that the 1998 200 ton bulk sample was salted with the 3 large top-gem-quality diamonds and management have used distortions and false rumors to keep the stock price up to unload their positions before the price plummets, and all the suckers who bought management's stock will now wait for the 6,000 ton sample dismal results!!!!

This is one side of the controversy.

The other side is that the 6,000 ton sample results will verify the 200 ton sample results.

Which is true? Here's a clue! It's been proven that management have misrepresented some things in the last six months, so why should they believed for anything???

I'm betting on the first scenerio!!!!



To: gg cox who wrote (15840)3/15/1999 8:07:00 PM
From: Digger  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
It is not like Winspear and Aber management have not been talking to each other, is it? I wonder if this move caught Aber people by surprise?

There could be something to this that is not yet above the table.

I hope the 8/1 rumor is close, that could make takeover tougher, depending on the new price per share.



HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News