Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neal davidson who wrote (76425)	3/16/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Neal - RE: "I wrote that Cramer published the article. You responded that Marcy Burstiner was the writer of the article. I may not know that much about chips. But as a lawyer, I sure as hell know the difference between writing and publishing." Let's clarify this. You implied that Cramer published the article possibly as a way of making money on Intel through shorting. I just stated that Marcy Burstiner was the actual writer of the article. Unless you think Cramer sees over all articles before they are published, there is no connection with what Cramer wanted and the negative spin the writer of the article had. Of course, one can easily say Cramer DID see over that article, even though he has proclaimed in public he is long Intel, as a way to drive the stock lower to purchase more at a lower price. But what are the chances of that happening? ;)