SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eggolas Moria who wrote (52289)3/17/1999 12:06:00 AM
From: IceShark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Meanwhile, Merrill Lynch & Co. has done its about-face on the stock, and after telling its clients it thinks the stock is worth $50 at most, now wants them to buy it at $138 — all the while maintaining that, hey, these are the opinions of the analysts, not the company that employs them.

In this particular house of ill repute, it would seem that the owner is just the piano player.


Actually you need to divide that "value" of 50 bucks by 3 (stock split) to get to Cohen's valuation. "House of ill repute" ... hoe, hoe hoe -g-

Regards, Ice



To: Eggolas Moria who wrote (52289)3/17/1999 8:13:00 AM
From: eddie r gammon  Respond to of 132070
 
Loved the article. Especially the " piano player in the house of ill repute" part (vbg)

erg



To: Eggolas Moria who wrote (52289)3/17/1999 9:33:00 AM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 132070
 
... Amazon.com reported ... roughly $29,000 of revenue per employee, which is about one-fourth the number for Saks and other old-line department stores ...

Call me crazy, but wouldn't the sales per employee for the aforementioned Barnes & Noble be more relevant? Perhaps that number didn't suit the conclusion he wanted to reach.

Tom



To: Eggolas Moria who wrote (52289)3/17/1999 10:17:00 AM
From: Stefan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Thanks for the article Gary. It confirms the insanity of AMZN holders.