Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Eutro ( EUTO ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Rice who wrote (10775)	3/19/1999 2:36:00 PM
From: Lurker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12043

<<You also know eutro could not possibly be dumping the millions of shares you claim it is physically impossible but you continue that lie about that too...>> Omigosh, EUTO can do the physically impossible! I just called the TA. Another 10 1/2 million shares were were dumped by EUTO last week. Diary of the impossible: ------------------------ Outstanding shares Date How long ago ------------------ ---- ------------ (In millions) 157 3/19/99 Today 146.5 3/12/99 Last Friday 145 3/8/99 2 weeks 118.5 12/98 3 months 98.5 9/98 6 months Any dork like me can call the TA at 1-303-792-3650. I may be a lying, fiendish, scumbag from the dark side of hell, but the TA tells no lies. Lurker (Germs hate the light of day.)

To: Robert Rice who wrote (10775)	3/19/1999 3:44:00 PM
From: Judith	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12043

Robert, Here is a serious question for you... Forgetting IVY and EUTO for a minute, when there is a reverse merger, and a previously private company takes over the shell of an existing public company, then isn't it normal for the existing public company to be compensated in some way? I can understand a private company wanting a clean shell, (although I would think they would want to find a clean shell that was also a reporting company.) I can understand the public company needing to pay off all liabilities. However, I don't think the public company has to raise money for other purposes to let the reverse merger happen. In the case of IVY and EUTO, here are my questions... What is IVY paying for the shell? Do they have to buy insider shares and more to have a controlling interest? Will the Wilkenson's still have shares in the merged shell and what percentage? Will they be on the board of the "new" company? Are they being personally compensated for this reverse merger? What are all the shares being issued into the float for? (It appears to be more than EUTO's stated outstanding liabilities and EUTO shouldn't be paying IVY to take over their public company) If the new shares are not being traded for cash by EUTO, then where are they going and under what situation is a company allowed to just gives shares to someone? If you want to forget all the past with EUTO, I still think there is a lot here about this reverse merger that doesn't make sense. I personally do not think this deal will ever really go through, but allowing for the possibility that I am wrong, perhaps you can give me your understanding of how this works. Thanks Judith .