Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (38834)	3/20/1999 9:11:00 AM
From: William H Huebl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

GZ, A strong move up (after weak Monday) would REALLY confound the markets! Unless you hear otherwise, I will <choke, choke> be buying CALLS on Monday. Bill

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (38834)	3/20/1999 6:13:00 PM
From: Lee Lichterman III	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 94695

OT >>the Serbian air defenses may be more sophisticated than the Iraqi's had and, therefore, our air strikes may not be as successful as in Iraq. << Iraq had the best air defense we have seen in a long while and I doubt Serbia will be much of a threat technology wise. HOWEVER, the increased danger lies in that targets are hidden better since it is not a wide open desert but instead has trees, cities etc. The terrain also is hilly and means we have to fly low level into valleys etc to evade radar rather than just launching anti radiation missiles from safe distances. It will be a challenge for sure. The other bad side affect of this conflict is there are friendlies in the area which means we can't just carpet bomb the whole stinking place with B-52s but instead must smart bomb targets as needed. Expensive and more limited damage slows the effect. FWIW, Lee