Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : 1st Net Technologies ( FNTT ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (233)	3/20/1999 11:57:00 AM
From: EyeDrMike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1827

seems you're the one with the vested interest: Message 8384917

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (233)	3/20/1999 11:57:00 AM
From: Razorbak	Respond to of 1827

ROFLMAO. This is classic! A Shakespearean tragicomedy, IMHO. Razor PS - Nice scoop, Tom.

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (233)	3/20/1999 12:00:00 PM
From: Josef Svejk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1827

Humble thanks, Kimberly, for your expert opinion on what the SEC will or will not do. It has been filed by me in the circular file. Now, to answer your irrelevant questions: 1. No. 2. No. 3. No. 4. No. In case you're wondering, yes, in my communication to the SEC I stated the above - explicitly. Any other questions? Cheers, Svejk proofsheet.com

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (233)	3/20/1999 12:05:00 PM
From: Razorbak	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1827

Correction <<As of today, Jeff Chatfield voluntarily makes proper disclosures in everything he publishes in this thread.>> Kimberly: I don't mean to get too technical, but it was actually last night, just by a smidgen, and only because he got busted (reply-8423275). <<Besides throwing it in some "no priority" obscure filing cabinet, the SEC would do nothing as far as your reporting is concerned. Rest be assured that they have far more important things to attend to than going after someone who is already in full compliance.>> Are you really that naive? (rhetorical question) <<Since you are so keen on reporting to the SEC, I might as well caution you that although you have not been properly Mirandized, everything you state here or elsewhere can be used against you, in both civil and criminal proceedings.>> GMA@B. You obviously don't know Mr. Svejk, but I understand your distress. Good luck on Monday. Razor

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (233)	3/20/1999 4:33:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Respond to of 1827

I'm in pain. My sides hurt. A couple of things about the SEC: Obviously you don't work for them, so with all due respect, it may be premature of you to announce their plans. This entire thread, up till yesterday, looks felonious to me. Pretty obvious. Your statement about "full compliance" begs the question: How would you know? Just interested, no short position, no compensation, none of that. (I liked the Miranda reference, too. Cool.)

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (233)	3/20/1999 5:37:00 PM
From: Fast Eddie	Respond to of 1827

Kimberly, Read with great interest the recent postings on this thread. I can't wait to SHORT this stock first thing Monday AM Best, Eddie