Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MeDroogies who wrote (2241)	3/22/1999 1:39:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13060

Your first response to my post (#1886) about government supporting values was this: "Where'd that come from? That is drivel."(#1893)

To: MeDroogies who wrote (2241)	3/22/1999 1:42:00 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 13060

This is your response to my post summarizing my arguments against abortion:"That is flawed from the start. The time it would take to tear that to shreds (and it is done easily enough) is not available to me now, unfortunately."

To: MeDroogies who wrote (2241)	3/22/1999 1:49:00 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 13060

This was the last paragraph of your supposed refutation of my points on abortion:"Don't foist your morals on people. It is unbecoming. You can live your life perfectly well without worrying about how moral I or my wife are. If we have an abortion (we wouldn't and haven't), how would that alter you life in any meaningful fashion? You have no right to use "morality" as a pretext for passing laws."

To: MeDroogies who wrote (2241)	3/22/1999 1:56:00 AM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 13060

When I reposted an observation about our positionin the world since WWII,ending with the observation that the United States "has tried, by its lights, to act responsibly in the world arena", this was your response: "World compassion via the use of force? That's why we are so well loved around the world? Get a grip.... "