Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MIDL .... A Real Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shell Searcher who wrote (5130)	3/22/1999 1:33:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7039

Here is a site refering to the 15c211 as it was before the amendment in Jan. 5, 1999 which I cannot find but looking... Once one security is up an trading then the others will follow suit. Each has to be dealt with individually from what I am reading. This is my own intrepretation ... law.uc.edu GB

To: Shell Searcher who wrote (5130)	3/22/1999 1:40:00 PM
From: im a survivor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7039

<<The status of 15c2-11s for the warrants and preferred is unknown, but typically the 15c2-11s for the different security types are filed together.>> So, is this unusual...bad omen for warrants, or what. It seems to me that all issues of the stock should eventually trade.......But what do I know ??? Why would they be allowed to trade some, but not all issues ? That seems a little odd to me....so the Co. is shut down, and then down the road, some shareholders get screwed but others get compensated ??? I don't see how the SEC could allow this to happen......Ya may as well simply state all shareholders whose name starts with a P,I,B,V,T,E,U,J,K,V or D get to trade their shares and all others don't.........It's no different then saying the common will trade but w's won't or p's won't. Sorry, not meaning to gripe here...just don't understand how this works....