Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Mongolia Gold Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave R. Webb who wrote (3279)	3/23/1999 8:46:00 PM
From: Phil Jones	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4066

Dave, with my last question I had in mind the situation where, even though TD and MAC know MGR's interest in an issue, it's in neither of their interests to raise the issue in court. For instance if the court is looking at whether MAC defaulted on its loan payment, neither TD nor MAC might want to raise the issue of whether the loan could have been legally made in the first place. I believe that in litigation in Canada between two parties, a third party can ask to be added as an interested party to the litigation if the third party's rights might be affected by the outcome. I thought that might be possible in the Mongolian courts. Anyway, this is a moot point since MGR wasn't in fact made a party to the litigation according to your last post. I'm looking forward to learning the outcome.