Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ColleenB who wrote (29685)	3/23/1999 4:09:00 PM
From: Lucky Charm	Respond to of 43774

Colleen, I just booked my flight to go see the NY offices on April 23, I believe there are seats still available should you decide to go directly to the source and see everything for yourself. The offer still stands, all expenses paid!!! For all the rest of my little New Yorker (and vicinity) friends, if y'all would like to get together for dinner or whatever, see the offices, let me know!!! This will stand to be our first little "PABN Thread Convention" Hahahaha, should be fun and I'd love to meet you all !! Kristi

To: ColleenB who wrote (29685)	3/23/1999 4:15:00 PM
From: Mr. K	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Don't you people have jobs -- where the hell do you get all this free time to go back and forth, over and over again, with the the same stuff? This is frightening -- some one is trying to manipulate this situation?? Someone please explain to me the deep rooted hatred some have for this stock?

To: ColleenB who wrote (29685)	3/23/1999 4:15:00 PM
From: J T	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

"practices performed and executed by Carl Kruse " I see ALLEGING NOT what you said colleenb. ALLEGE:to assert without proof or before proving Remember this? "and while you're at it jhild....don't forget to mention the date....1995!!...OLD news" Don't forget this great advise... "sorry don't know the man....already told you that..and jhild, sweetie...this thread is supposed to discuss PRWT (and potatoes)..if you wish to chat about carl...please create your own thread.." Why not PRACTICE it? Also.... "In fact after reading the citation that Legalbeast has kindly posted I guess that I had the wrong one." "I guess that the one that I cited was for another case entirely that must have happened the year before" #reply-7125596 PEACE JT

To: ColleenB who wrote (29685)	3/23/1999 6:32:00 PM
From: LegalBeast	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Talk about twisted interpretation. jhild, any time there is the slightest room for argument, you discredit any source that tends to support anything about this company and yet you insist on basing your entire argument on an article that is completely flawed, lists a case that does not exist and you call it fact. No technicality there, Mr. FRAUD. Either there is a real case or there is not. Come up with the case cite or case number or admit your fraud. It is that simple. Let's go thru it once more, shall we? 1. You know this article is riddled with errors. 2. You profess that this article is the genuine fact of the situation. 3. You continue to rely on this flawed reference to defend yourself. There is no circular reasoning involved. You know it is wrong yet you continue to rely and post it as fact. That is fraud on your part and is indicative of your total approach to this stock. You "selectively" chose to copy where I said it "appears" that there is no case, but chose not to copy the last paragraph where I told you that I already have the answer, and that is that there is NO OTHER CASE. Am I wrong? Prove it by providing the legal cite, not your continued fraud. As to business practices, don't you think that you need a conviction before asserting that anyone is guilty of anything?? Sorry for you, your "evidence" is evidence of nothing. It takes first a case and then a conviction, neither of which you have.