OK
To: astheworldturns (29841 )
From: ColleenB Thursday, Mar 25 1999 6:35AM ET
Reply # of 29845
Could you have possibly found a post which suggests that jhild does provide DD for the threads he graces? Or were you showing the thread that they waste too much time on bickering off topic and have been doing so for MONTHS? [note the date of that post, October]
OK!
To: Selfop (29528 )
From: ColleenB Sunday, Mar 21 1999 8:49AM ET
Reply # of 29845
Cool. Have you been making money off the picks we've posted? Sure beats the heck out of waiting on PABN to do something, doesn't it?
And exactly what is your problem with the thread? If you have a problem with the contents I'd suggest you don't visit MoneyMade's thread, Rande's thread, Tim Luke's thread, Anthony's thread, Wayne's thread.. and a whole slew of other threads who's sole purpose is to post plays of the day. These threads are not in existence to discuss the merits of each stock, rather what's in play.
To: barbara sperino (29757 )
From: ColleenB Wednesday, Mar 24 1999 2:46PM ET
Reply # of 29844
LOL, wouldn't that be fun, a food theme. Oh, and btw, the proper wording in today's society is culinary arts. And, now that you point this out, hasn't he mentioned Martha Stewart in some old posts?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
To: LegalBeast (29676 )
From: ColleenB Tuesday, Mar 23 1999 2:02PM ET
Reply # of 29845
Well, it has taken me some time, but I have unraveled the mystery of the spat between you and jhild regarding your claims that he altered a document.
You claim....
he changed the names of the litigants in the case to try to make folks believe that someone was charged that was not even named in the case.#reply-8434541
When in fact here's what he posted...no where does he say Carl was mentioned in this case. And, the odd thing is, he provides no comments on this what so ever.
U.S. ex rel. Virgin Islands Housing Authority v. Coastal General
Construction Services Corp. et al., 27 F.3d 911 (3rd Cir. 1994)
Here is a citation. I leave it to you to go dig out the results of this particular case. #reply-7119000
Here is where I found your circular reasoning.
Yet if you go there, you find the real case cite that does NOT mention Carl Kruze or any other individual. since you admit copying the cite, then you also stand convicted of changing the parties to attempt to vindicate yourself. #reply-7157954
You use the if A then B hypothesis. You claim that because jhild posted a link, one which shows the 1994 case and not the 1995 case he is guilty of changing the names of the defendants in the case. Did he make a mistake and provide you with the 1994 case and not the 1995 case, yes. Never mind he had already provided the link to the 1995 case. I assume he thought it was the original case to cite. However, he made no comments about the 1994 case he simply passed the information onto you.
Jhild later clarifies his statement about citing the 1994 case as follows....
It apparently cites the same construction company, in what I believe now is a different action than reported in the original article, as the date (1994 v. 1995) on the article and the list of defendants is different.#reply-7141154
and later....
the citation reference that I gave you, could not possibly be the right one. This citation is for US 3rd District Court of Appeals, dated 1994. From the looks of it it was returned to the District Court. The Press Release that I have been quoting is dated 1995.
#reply-7158286
I cannot find where he, as you claim changed the names of the litigants. I showed your if A then B hypothesis and why you think you can make this claim. But it just doesn't wash.
Here's the case where Carl IS named....please note that it's the 1995 case, which btw, DOES list the same construction company as was named in the 1994 case.
arentfox.com
Carl's involvement with PRWT/PABN is a real issue because of his statement here....which was posted on Jan 3rd of this year on the RagingBull
By the end of this month, we should see some great Press Releases and a material increase in the share price. Factually, I brought a Dominican Republic home financing transaction to PRWT and it should be a big money maker in 1999. I also referred another $32 million in 1999 Belize mortgages to PRWT which will likely be super profitable. Next mortgage project is Honduras, which I will begin working on with my Dominican Republic associate in about two weeks.
ragingbull.com
Think any of those $32 million dollars in mortgages in Belize have cleared yet?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
To: LegalBeast (29685 )
From: ColleenB Tuesday, Mar 23 1999 3:39PM ET
Reply # of 29845
Now then if you want to give a legal cite to the "right" case perhaps you may clear your name, but as of now, it appears that there is no other case
So, you're really hung up on some technicality. You would rather twist this 'evidence' of supposed less than stellar business practices performed and executed by Carl Kruse because it's an article and not the official legal document where he was charged? This tactic might work in a court room, but we're investors here. This forum is a place to exchange information, not have it stifled by some pompous blowhard because it appears that there is no other case. This article indicates otherwise, and at the very least it should wave a few red flags in your face.
If you think that this man, who has admitted to having quite some interests/business dealings in PRWT/PABN beyond the normal investor is not suspect or worth investigating, then that is your choice. But others might not have the same view as you.
arentfox.com
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
To: J T (29696 )
From: ColleenB Tuesday, Mar 23 1999 4:23PM ET
Reply # of 29845
I see ALLEGING NOT what you said colleenb.
You would rather twist this 'evidence' of supposed less than stellar business practices performed and executed by Carl Kruse #reply-8477865
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
To: LegalBeast (29521 )
From: ColleenB Saturday, Mar 20 1999 8:51PM ET
Reply # of 29845
I don't suppose you came up with that link I asked you about, did you? The one where you claim jhild altered a legal document. Also, still waiting for you to post your side of the conversation we had. Care to comply?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
To: Lucky Charm (29715 )
From: ColleenB Tuesday, Mar 23 1999 8:51PM ET
Reply # of 29844
Carl's involvement with PRWT/PABN is a real issue because of his statement here....which was posted on Jan 3rd of this year on the RagingBull. This is not something an average investor would ever say or claim.
By the end of this month, we should see some great Press Releases and a material increase in the share price. Factually, I brought a Dominican Republic home financing transaction to PRWT and it should be a big money maker in 1999. I also referred another $32 million in 1999 Belize mortgages to PRWT which will likely be super profitable. Next mortgage project is Honduras, which I will begin working on with my Dominican Republic associate in about two weeks.
ragingbull.com
Anybody hear anything about these super profitable mortgages in Belize, in the range of $32 Million dollars? How's the processing on these coming along? They'd better get cracking, those two homes won't last.
Does anyone see Colleen's point to all this nonsense???
The real question is, who is talking nonsense?
The real question is, who is talking nonsense...
|
