Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: .Trev who wrote (16746)	3/25/1999 3:16:00 PM
From: teevee	Respond to of 26850

Trev., I hate to disappoint you, but I have received too many PM's about average joe....he is unemployable...he lives off his inheritance....and we all know the rest of his sordid background as a rural bachelor from Southern Saskatchewan... regards, teevee

To: .Trev who wrote (16746)	3/25/1999 3:19:00 PM
From: bill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

I believe I suggested in an earlier post that threadsters might benefit from reading the highly organized, disruptive, negative posts on the SUF thread when SUF and DeBeers came into conflict. When individuals have time to post constantly, you know they must have a lot of time on their hands. That means they are a. unemployed (unlikely here) b. teenagers on dad's computer (unlikely again) c. or being paid to mount a continued attack. When there is a constant attempt not to inform but to undermine and disrupt,one has to ask who is paying someone to spend time doing this. Who would benefit? Since there is no sense of stock being traded but rather attacks on the credibility of anyone who posts, including highly experienced, on site individuals like Walt, one has to assume that the resources of time and money have a purpose. The question is what company is the most likely to benefit by constantly attacking WSP and any of its supporters? ABZ? Unlikely. KLA, SND, SUF? They don't seem to be candidates. MPV, perhaps. Some time back any mention of MPV elicited a personal attack.However, after the individual was idenified it stopped. Some IR's seem to think that part of their job to attack anyone they see as a competitor