SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Fiondella who wrote (26304)3/26/1999 5:32:00 PM
From: Spartex  Respond to of 42771
 
A Novell Idea for Networking: Lean on Your Partners
(From TheStreet.com)

By Medora Lee
Staff Reporter
3/22/99 1:00 PM ET

SAN FRANCISCO -- Novell (NOVL:Nasdaq) has
found that luck favors those who deliver on time.

Over the past year, the Provo, Utah, software
company has found a way to live in a Microsoft
(MSFT:Nasdaq) world without getting squashed. In
the early 1990s, Novell went head to head with the
Redmond, Wash., software giant in the battle to
control network operating systems and software
programs for personal computers. Novell was nearly
buried in the Windows NT onslaught and was on
the brink of becoming a has-been.

Today, under the tutelage of CEO Eric Schmidt, the
former chief technology officer at Sun
Microsystems (SUNW:Nasdaq), the company has
a new and, apparently, winning strategy that has
received accolades from Wall Street. Schmidt, who
joined the company in 1997, applied several
measures to pull the company together: He closed
down unprofitable product lines, cut back staff and
focused the company on the business of network
directories -- especially on Novell Directory Service,
or NDS.

Last September, Novell delivered -- on time -- its
Netware 5 product, which allows corporations to
run corporate intranets. By contrast, Microsoft's
Windows 2000, formerly known as Windows NT
5.0, has been delayed by two years and has yet to
ship. Windows 2000 includes an active directory
that will compete with Novell's primary directory
product.

Microsoft's stumbles have allowed Novell a rare
chance to shine. And Schmidt has taken full
advantage of the opportunity. In late February,
Novell reported its sixth consecutive quarter of solid
results. The company's profits doubled, with sales
jumping 13% year over year and the
directory-related business now making up to 80% of
revenue. Novell's stock has also steadily risen more
than 150% since October to hit its highest level
since February 1994. On Friday, the stock closed
at 26 3/16, 1/8 higher for the day and significantly
up from 18 3/16 when the year began.

Because Novell's directory products work across
platforms, companies like to use them when they
are considering directory services for the Internet,
on which there is currently no standard platform,
says a Boston-based buy-side analyst. More
customers need services that can operate across
different platforms, a demand that Microsoft has,
until lately, ignored. While Microsoft pushes its own
Windows systems, Novell's strategy is to partner
and work with other vendors to make its products
work everywhere -- on any box or router
manufactured by any company. That way,
customers don't have to revamp their entire IT
infrastructure to get connected.

By eschewing a single standard, Novell has the
opportunity to make significant inroads in the
directory services market, says the buy-side
analyst. "The opportunity to get in on a company
like that doesn't come along very often."

In the past two weeks, two Wall Street investment
banks have upgraded Novell. On March 12, Morgan
Stanley Dean Witter analyst Chuck Phillips raised
his rating to outperform from neutral, and on March
17, Merrill Lynch analyst Joe Bellace upgraded his
long-term rating to buy from accumulate. Bellace
left his near-term rating at accumulate. Neither firm
has underwritten for Novell.

In his report to investors, Phillips pointed out that
"Novell held a partners' summit last month, and it
was standing room only. The company had to turn
away potential attendees to this invitation-only
event, which drew nearly 300 partners from across
the country. Novell tried the same summit a year
ago and couldn't get enough attendees to put on the
event."

Steve Adelman, Novell's vice president of corporate
development, stresses that partnerships are a key
to the company's growth strategy. Unlike Microsoft,
which promotes only its own products, Novell
customers "say they want everything to work
together," Adelman says. "We're not going to start
building hardware and database, but we'll make
sure our software works with their systems."

Interest in Novell is expected to continue to build at
the company's annual BrainShare user
conference, which began on Sunday and runs
through Friday. A company spokesman says about
6,000 people have signed up to attend the
conference, up sharply from about 4,500 last year.

Phillips also notes Novell's switch to a license
model based on the number of users rather than
servers has made Novell's NetWare software more
easily and broadly deployed. Phillips says
enterprise license agreements grew 54% last year,
and more than 80% of that business was for deals
over $100,000.

Merrill Lynch's Bellace expects Novell to announce
next week an alliance with Compaq (CPQ:NYSE)
and one other company for a fast-caching product
that would improve network storage and bandwidth.
Specialist companies like Inktomi (INKT:Nasdaq)
currently have proprietary caching products, but
these are more expensive.

As long as Microsoft remains a competitor,
however, risk lurks for Novell investors. Microsoft's
first crack at a product may not be great, but
subsequent versions could easily pose a threat.
Just ask Netscape (NSCP:Nasdaq).

Despite that threat, the Boston-based buy-side
analyst, who does not own Novell stock, says he is
keeping an eye on the company. "I might wait a
little while, just to make sure it's going to take the
market, but once it looks headed that way, as an
individual investor, I would take the gamble. The
rewards could be huge."



To: Paul Fiondella who wrote (26304)3/26/1999 6:06:00 PM
From: Alomex  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 42771
 
For the internet, the killer app was the browser.

This is a common misconception. The killer app of the internet is e-mail. People could live without browsing, but there is just no way the modern corporation would give up e-mail.

This "I wonder how I ever managed without it" quality defines a killer app.

The Web is still waiting for its killer app. E-commerce has a good chance of being that, once most retailers are online. But this remains to be seen.

The web is nice, popular and useful, but it is not a "must have", just like PC games. In fact quite a few corporations ban browsing during work hours, again just like with computer games.

The web is big, and it will get bigger, just like there are some very succesful pc-gaming companies, but people do not go around saying "pc games are the killer app of the PC". Neither is the web the killer app of the internet.



To: Paul Fiondella who wrote (26304)3/27/1999 1:28:00 AM
From: PJ Strifas  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42771
 
<<DigitalMe (the killer app) + NDS (the platform) equals revenue stream.>>

Ok, I can understand where you are coming from and believe me, I've had this discussion before in many places. Let me back up a moment because I think we differ in just one place.

From what I understand (and please let me know if I'm wrong folks) is that digitalme is NOT a product in the way that Visicalc was for Apple or the browser for the web. digitalme would be more like HTTP in your web analogy. It's the underlying technology that the app will sit upon.

See, a browser is an app which allows you to use HTTP to access HTML pages.

Whenever! is an app which allows you to use digitalme technology to access a digital ID held within a "vault" (NDS).

That's how I understand this whole digitalme technology from what I've read about it, heard about it and saw it do. But it will work in the same manner that you have spoken about. It will create a revenue stream for Novell, how and what that will be has yet to be determined by the people I spoke with.

Now this doesn't mean that they are missing the boat or losing precious time. What makes digitalme really wonderous and powerful is the directory and NO ONE has anything to compete with NDS. Do you think IBM decided to integrate it's WebSphere product into NetWare and NDS for no reason other than to thwart MSFT's E-Commerce thrust?

They see where Novell is heading with NDS, digitalme and i-Chain and they don't want to miss this boat. Everyone is listening and watching Novell right now and for digitalme to really be the "killer" technology we are all betting it will be, Novell will have to find a way to make it open source framework with little licensing or up front $$ as possible.

The lower the entry point the easier it will be for people to develop the right communities for digitalme to become the effective digital tool is should be. It will drive NDS sales into the stratosphere.

Let's face it, no one is going to buy into a proprietary system (if Novell holds it and doesn't make it a standard) that will ultimately become the only way to do business online. Let's learn from lessons from the past as you state, let's not hold too tightly to something that will become the center of our lives one day.

As for the killer app theory, the WWW was the reason the INTERNET reached the masses. That means any component of the web (HTTP, HTML, the browser) all play a role in this.

Let's remember that AOL put a graphical (proprietary) face onto the internet before the web became as pervasive to the point that it mattered. The web is barely 8 years old (first publicly accessible server went up in April 1991 actually) so let's not judge which one "app" made it so popular.

If you ask me, it was making things easier that brought people onto the internet and the browser had something to do with that yes. On the other hand, email is the most widely used process on the internet making up about 80% of all internet traffic at any given time. If that's a measure of "can't do without" then you could take the perspective that email is the killer app (as it's been often been referenced as).

:) Peter Strifas