Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: slotman who wrote (30068)	3/26/1999 6:57:00 PM
From: Coral4pH_dot_com	Respond to of 43774

"Larry Roof, [PABN's Internet Group] R&D Director, is a guest speaker at the upcoming Microsoft Tech. Ed conference in Dallas" amazon.com amazon.com Talk about a "Sleeping Bear" waiting to emerge .... PABN is going to ROCKET!!! No hype ... just watch!!!! I deploy Windows CE and VB applications to more than 200 countries and I had no idea, until now, that Larry Roof was the PABN Internet Group Research and Development Director. We are in VERY goods hands people!!!!!!!!!!!

To: slotman who wrote (30068)	3/26/1999 7:07:00 PM
From: ColleenB	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

Well, for starters I wonder about the connection PRWT/PABN still has with NHLT. Did you read the PR they released a few days ago? NHLT mentions that they are in negotiations with a PRIVATE company. Well, our Delaware PABN is not private, but not sure if this is a loophole and the Nevada Corp of PABN is technically private as the RM still hasn't taken place (to my knowledge, it's been a week or two since I last checked, but I wouldn't be surprised to see PABN Corp still listed in good standing at the Nevada website). Then if you reread the shareholders meeting that took place last month, I commented that I thought John's responses regarding 84Lumber and something else raised an eye brow. His response was that he didn't respond to rumor, not that we are in negotiations, rather he dismissed these few questions about entities we've heard about for MONTHS as rumors. And there are a few other nagging things I wonder about the company's resolve in pursuing. Your turn

To: slotman who wrote (30068)	3/26/1999 8:55:00 PM
From: dirtroad	Respond to of 43774

John wrote "as a result, we have chosen "not" to pursue certain opportunities". To me, that is the key statement of the letter. Exactly which opportunities have we chosen to not pursue. This question demands a much more defined answer. As a stock holder for close to a year now, one who holds in excess of 1/2 million shares of the company, I feel entitled to know just what the hell I am invested in. Which of the projects that I have invested in are being dropped, and why? Enough of the vague half statements. This information does not have to be audited. The answers are known to the company right now. They should be related to the stockholders with something more definite than "certain opportunities." If the company felt it to be all right to indicate to us what projects they were pursuing, at the time they were pursuing them. Then it is equally all right to let us know which ones are no longer part of what we paid for. If I had purchased a vacation package that promised two weeks at Tahoe, tickets to different shows, meals, boat and dock, etc., then received a letter stating that "certain" of these features were to be eliminated, I damn sure would want to know which ones. Is this that much different. I bought into a company based on a certain business model. If that model is now being changed, what are the changes and why are they being made. I think everyone knows that I am not a basher. While not one of the most prolific posters, I have posted enough, both here and SI, that I have a history of my posts listed in my profile. Where I have always stood should be clear to anyone who cares to look. But enough is enough. I am invested in a publicly traded company, not the CIA. There is absolutely no excuse for the constant "cloak and dagger" non-statements. John, if you have bitten off more than you can chew at least have the decency to let us know what it is you plan to be spitting on us. dirtroad