Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JGoren who wrote (25395)	3/28/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: Labrador	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

$250 a share and I'd be thinking real hard on selling out. ;-) --Even $225 would make me thing about it.

To: JGoren who wrote (25395)	3/28/1999 1:01:00 PM
From: Jon Koplik	Respond to of 152472

Okay, "Goren." Maybe Powers or Hare or Winn have some thoughts. Koplik. eom.

To: JGoren who wrote (25395)	3/28/1999 1:40:00 PM
From: Jon Koplik	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

And furthermore ... (regarding institutional share ownership as a useful defense against unwanted "suitors") let me repeat a concept that a friend of mine (who runs a hedge fund involved in risk arbitrage) once told me. If you try to "intellectualize" why it is that a risk arbitrageur can make so much money, one way to do it is as follows : Mutual fund A owns QCOM at an average cost of $55 a share, because they wanted to make a bet on CDMA wireless. QCOM goes up to $110-ish on various developments. Then (hypothetically) some douchebag company launches a hostile tender offer for Qualcomm at $200 a share. QCOM jumps to $185. Fund A then makes a "portfolio decision," based on several factors including : Qualcomm is now (undoubtedly) a larger percentage of the mutual fund's total assets -- possibly over some "magic number" level in the mutual fund's charter (or, whatever they call it). Also, the upside and downside could now be perceived as : (with no additional bidders) $200 in a few months if everything actually happens, OR (probably) $130 or so if the attack goes away somehow. Even though Fund A believes that if they hold on to their Qualcomm shares with the going price at $185, and then QCOM does go back to $130, that Qualcomm will eventually exceed $185 a share, they would probably still sell some or all of their position. Guess where their shares sold go ? Into the hands of the risk arb players. Eventually, the dynamics of who owns what start flip-flopping towards the "hot money" risk arbs controlling a lot of shares, and the die hard people (like us) owning less and less. At some price level, a takeover is sort of inevitable. But, if the management of the target has explained things well enough, it can be at a high enough price so that it was a huge mistake for the suitor (check out almost every acquisition that AT&T has made, for some examples). (Another way to put this whole thing -- Mutual Fund A is NOT in the risk arbitrage business, and therefore "exits" some or all of its massive share position once something becomes a risk arb situation only). Jon.