Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jhild who wrote (30371)	3/29/1999 6:42:00 PM
From: Coral4pH_dot_com	Respond to of 43774

Jhild, Thanks for your input. Good luck to you. Maybe we will run into each other on another thread. You have made your side clear and now I'm sure it would be appropriate for you to move on to another company. Take care!

To: jhild who wrote (30371)	3/29/1999 6:57:00 PM
From: ERRAFF	Respond to of 43774

Well at least you are posting under the right name!

To: jhild who wrote (30371)	3/29/1999 7:00:00 PM
From: LegalBeast	Respond to of 43774

<<<<< You guys really fall all over yourselves to stifle any responsible discussion, don't you? >>>>> Since when have YOU engaged in responsible discussion, Mr. FRAUD? It looks like your student is learning well. First I posted message #reply-8573693. Now that was a real attempt to discuss the issues, but then your sweety chose to misrepresent what I said in #reply-8577542. Ever since I pointed out her fraud, all she seems able to do is cry and whine that we are calling names and making unfounded accusations. If you want a responsible discussion, then stop committing FRAUD. Thus far you have not allowed any responsible discussion to take place because of your FRAUD. To: ColleenB (30290 ) From: LegalBeast Monday, Mar 29 1999 1:48PM ET Reply # of 30377 Wow, just like your mentor, A FRAUD SPEAKS OF FRAUD ... Lets examine the record ... I suppose that you will deny this, but since it is all within the last day, I trust you won't need links to find it, Ms. FRAUD? Your comment which gets you what you deserve: I believe you have taken liberty to one statement I've made, to which I've made specific reference to and didn't make it a wide ranging all encompassing statement. So when I said: Rather, it is just another piece of credibility for the company. It goes like this: Panam has, as its director of R&D a person who is so qualified and so involved in cutting edge technology that he is selected for this honor, and it is indeed an honor. From this you are perhaps thinking that if such a professional is on the PABN team, then PABN must be a bit more than a scam and actual R&D must be going on. What R&D? Heck, I dunno, but neither do you. All we do know is that we are amassing a stable full of professionals who can get the job done, don't you think? You chose to only take one little piece and infer that I said something I never said at all. What you copied and said was: "The fact that Larry is presenting does not speak to the "Big Time". Rather, it is just another piece of credibility for the company." Does it really? Isn't he and the other "boys" hired consultants? I seem to have read a post on the bull that somebody had quite a lengthy phone conversation with someone and his post explained that these gentlemen were consultants to PanAm. And given Mr. Roof's background (published programming books) coupled with the fact that this is really an educational seminar (read the Microsoft links), I am wondering just how much exposure PanAm will really get out of this. Doesn't it really seem more likely that he's going to tout the billing program that he created (I believe he may be the creator)? These computer professionals will not be interested in the health services division of PanAm. What is more probable is that they will be interested in the programming of said item. So, the question is what is there really to get excited about for PanAm stock holders? The fact that PanAm has hired consultants to program for them? Now Ms. FRAUD, I never said anything about exposure for Panam, now did I? Neither did John, did he? In fact, my point was nothing like you tried to MISREPRESENT, now was it, Ms. FRAUD? We are talking about qualifications here, nothing more. You wonder why folks will not discuss the issues with you? Here is an example of where you take a reasonable comment and try to turn it into something it never said. Now tell us, Ms. FRAUD, how many names do you post under over on RB?