Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carl R. who wrote (44603)	3/29/1999 9:30:00 PM
From: DavidG	Respond to of 53903

Carl, A lot of good points there...some of the reasons why I like to trade MU. DavidG

To: Carl R. who wrote (44603)	3/30/1999 11:02:00 AM
From: Tom Moore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53903

>>we know you already are thinking "MU's business sucks", but also ask yourself "will MU's business suck more tomorrow", or at least "will it be any more clear tomorrow that MU's business sucks". If it won't suck any more tomorrow than it sucks today, why should it go down?<< LOL. so true, so true. Benjamin Graham's gotta be rolling in his grave. T.M.

To: Carl R. who wrote (44603)	3/30/1999 12:56:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53903

>>If it won't suck any more tomorrow than it sucks today, why should it go down?<< a brilliant future is already priced into this bag. current business isn't brilliant. if it falls short of brilliant - even if it is better than now - this bag will deflate. also, if money supply is restricted, all else being equal, this bag will deflate.