SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lorne who wrote (17195)3/30/1999 10:49:00 PM
From: kidl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
Lorne,
Face it, this a no win for Aber!
All WSP can loose is legal fees. Aber may loose 1/2 their slice of Snap.
Like I said on the Aber thread, did you notice the missing reference to any sort of payment or payment attempt?
Bull on Aber's part IMO.
kidl



To: Lorne who wrote (17195)3/30/1999 10:50:00 PM
From: Gord Bolton  Respond to of 26850
 
The first rule of settling disputes where there is a contract. If the contract provides the resolution-there is no dispute or should I say no disputing it.
If Winspear would have taken the money and used the money and then said that Aber was being diluted for failure to give notice, Aber would have a case. It would appear that all of the work being done has been funded by Winspear's shareholders. Winspear shareholders have taken all the risk.
Do you really have an arguement why you should reap the benefits?



To: Lorne who wrote (17195)3/30/1999 10:54:00 PM
From: Rocket Red  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26850
 
Hey Lorne
Keep your barking down or take it to the Aber Thread.
Aber clearly should have at least put there money up to cover costs.
Its not a free World.