Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumell who wrote (2697)	3/30/1999 11:54:00 PM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5821

Bob - haven't been following the drilling details - but how deep is this stuff - is it a potential open pit situation or underground? Excuse my ignorance. dd

To: Brumell who wrote (2697)	3/31/1999 8:52:00 AM
From: mineman	Respond to of 5821

Brumell, you need to look at the economics of the project at each step. There may be other small lenses of high grade nickel within the gabbroic body, but none have been intersected in the holes released to date. Also there was no mention of "visual" sulphides in any of holes 10 to 18. Overshadowing this is the fact that 5 released drill holes around the high-grade pod under hole 4 and 6 did not intersect the pod and the only direction that is currently open is to the southwest. Hole 7 was a huge dissapointment as it was expected the high grade zone would continue towards the center of the gabbroic tubular shaped body and even possibly thicken. But hole 7 showed the high-grade nickel is cut-off towards the north-east. I don't believe anything said is pure conjecture and in fact all comments add information to an enlarging database of the current and future prospects for this project.