Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FJV who wrote (39203)	3/31/1999 4:04:00 AM
From: Brad Bolen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

**OT* RE: . With 50 civil wars going on around the world, many of which having taken a much higher human toll than Kosovo, ask yourself why we chose this one to flex our muscles. I see these kind of statements a lot in the context that this is like the other conflicts, and I don't get it... (not necessarily you, BTW) How many other conflicts are as likely to destabilize the world? The Congo? This area already started at least one world war. My guess is the US knows this thing is about to spread anyway, and this is the only chance to stop it. A no win situation....as usual. B.

To: FJV who wrote (39203)	3/31/1999 5:46:00 PM
From: Andy Thomas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

If peace in Yugoslavia is so critical to the EU, why involve the US at all? Why don't they make it a non-NATO effort and instead send in a multinational force of Germans, French, and British? How did this become an American issue? FWIW Andy