Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hope who wrote (41540)	3/31/1999 10:56:00 AM
From: Howard C.	Respond to of 50264

I don't know, but I think you are right in that certainly it cannot be considered as serious. And there is no doubt in my mind that the two cases are NOT comparable.

To: Hope who wrote (41540)	3/31/1999 10:57:00 AM
From: Jane4IceCream	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Rather, maybe having something to do with the company they keep. And terms of payment. Just my guess. Jane at the beach

To: Hope who wrote (41540)	3/31/1999 1:36:00 PM
From: Little Engine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

Hope, if DGIV were to be halted, wouldn't it make sense to for the SEC to do it after the end of the investigation, once they came to some conclusions? Doubt this stock will be halted, since few are. FAMH was one of the most fraudulent companies I ever saw, but was never halted. The SEC does not do a very thorough job of keeping an eye on OTC stocks. There are just too many of them. The question is not what DGIV is being investigated for (Jane's dropped hints), but whether there is any substance behind their promises, like those of a year ago promising audited financials. The stock needs substance, not "dog and pony shows", if there is any hope of most people recovering their initial investment.