SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Wexler who wrote (10052)3/31/1999 11:26:00 PM
From: golden_tee   Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
Hey Wexler, how's your BTIM short doing? Looks like you were dead wrong on that one too. Looks like they are going to hand you your short hat in the A.M.. Why anyone sees a shoot-from-the-hip investor like you as a guru is beyond me. You haven't done any research on VLNC and look, well, stupid to those who have. Everyone on this board bull or bear (Visnic excluded), knows more about this stock than you do. I thoroughly embarrassed you on your own site, now you come here to do it to yourself? I should point out that the PM's from your followers have been Bob 7, Bill 3, Neutral 3. See, what you fail to understand, is that the VLNC posters/investors may just know things that you don't. Financing... not an issue. Contracts... You answer that one.
Bob



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (10052)3/31/1999 11:38:00 PM
From: incomep  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27311
 
Bill:
The coming market correction will put VLNC retailers in a real test to see how much margin they are going to put up. The floorless convertible may crush the equity to $1/share. Would your cover at that price?
Incomep



To: Bill Wexler who wrote (10052)4/1/1999 1:53:00 AM
From: Pallisard  Respond to of 27311
 
Bringing back two year old posts and punctuating it with today's close doesn't convince or assure me of anything, except that you seem desperate to convince everyone else that VLNC will fail. I imagine that's because you're 25,000 shares short? At least so you've said.