SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mohan Marette who wrote (113831)4/1/1999 10:33:00 AM
From: Boplicity  Respond to of 176387
 
Get your internet nodes while their hot.

biz.yahoo.com

Own a piece of the net.

Greg



To: Mohan Marette who wrote (113831)4/1/1999 10:39:00 AM
From: JRI  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
Thanks for the article on Dell's expansion...Make sense...I was wondering how-in-the-heck Dell found all the workers they needed (in Austin)..

Did you notice that Rollins used the 17% growth rate again. Last November, MD used the 17% rate...A couple months ago, when sales were slow for the industry, MD & TM were saying 15-17%....in reading the tealeaves, this could be a signal that growth picked up again in the last 2 months..only speculation, of course...but I'd be surprised if they are not careful is saying 15 vs 17 vs some other number...

I love 17%!




To: Mohan Marette who wrote (113831)4/1/1999 10:54:00 AM
From: Lee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
Hi Mohan,..Re:.EconomyWatch---->Events that could affect the markets today.

Looks like the healthy data did cause bonds to sag a little! <g>
Here it is.
Weekly Jobless claims = -6000 to 289k
dol.gov

Construction Spending for Feb. = +2.2%
census.gov

Personal income = +0.5%
Spending = +0.7%
(remember, consumer spending is 2/3 of GDP)
bea.doc.gov

NAPM = 54.3%
napm.org

Happy Thursday,

Lee



To: Mohan Marette who wrote (113831)4/1/1999 11:06:00 AM
From: SecularBull  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 176387
 
Mohan-san...a must read -->

> Name of Media: Nikkei Sangyo Shimbun
> Issue Date: March 30, 1999, morning
> Circulation: 225,000 copies
> Page: 32
> Filed by: Ikuo Saijo (New York)
>
> Will IBM PCs Disappear?
> PC Operations Show a $1 Billion Deficit for 1998
> IBM Shifts to Parts Supply
> "Era of PCs Is Coming to an End," says CEO
>
> New York, by Ikuo Saijo -- US-based IBM's PC business is beginning to
> become a burden to the company. Last year, only the PC-related operations
> showed a deficit - of $1 billion - while the company as a whole showed
> favorable growth. This clearly shows that its PC business is pulling IBM
> down. On the other hand, its OEM business of providing competitive
> companies like Dell Computer with parts and components such as HDDs and
> displays is growing quickly. The emphasis of the PC business is being
> shifted from "completed products" to "parts." Many observers are calling
> for IBM's withdrawal from the PC market. IBM - the "parent of PCs,"
> together with Apple, has reached a turning point.
>
> What does the alliance really mean?
>
> On March 4, IBM employees received an e-mail from David Thomas, senior
> vice president administrating IBM's PC business, in which he noted that
> the most important thing to users is not the parts used to build PCs but
> the degree of value that can be actualized by using those PCs.
>
> On the same day, IBM announced an alliance with Dell Computer to provide a
> total of $16 billion in parts. The stock market received this news
> favorably, such that IBM stock rose. On the other hand, the Personal
> Systems (PS) department, responsible for IBM's PC business, was shocked
> because they felt that supplying parts to Dell, a competitor, was akin
> providing the enemy with too great an opportunity. To suppress
> dissatisfaction in the PS department, as well as a general air of unease,
> David Thomas went on to emphasize that it is "not the individual parts but
> the total value of the product" that is important.
>
> The environment in which IBM is selling PCs is severe. In the profit and
> loss statements for each department, dating from fiscal 1998, the PS
> department showed a pre-tax deficit of $992 million. Although 1998 sales
> of the PS department reached $12.8 billion, that is, 14% of IBM's total
> sales, the deficit is increasing quickly. Although it is said that
> earnings have been improving since the end of 1998, due to a drastic
> clearance sale of stock in the first half of the year, the extent to which
> earnings will improve is unclear, given continued price competition.
>
> Withdrawal with honor
>
> The slump in IBM's PC business is not temporary. The PC business was in
> the red in 1996 and 1997, albeit marginally, when the market expanded
> quickly. Thus, any analyst would question why IBM continues to offer PCs.
> Although IBM occupies second place (after Compaq Computer) in terms of
> worldwide sales, it ranks fourth in the US market, having been overtaken
> by Dell Computer and Gateway 2000.
>
> The key to making a profit in the PC business is minimizing inventory.
> IBM has been wrestling with improvements in this area by imitating Dell
> Computer, said to be the most efficient manufacturer. There seems to be a
> limit, however, to the degree of improvement that IBM can achieve.
> Compared with Dell Computer, that holds absolutely no stock of completed
> products and which relies on direct sales, "IBM cannot easily reduce its
> stock levels because the company sells mostly through retail outlets.
> This is, therefore, a poignant example of a new company starting from zero
> and gaining an edge over existing companies with links to the past.

>
> Carl Hau, an analyst with US-based research company, Forrester Research,
> Inc. recommends "a withdrawal with honor from the PC market by setting up
> an alliance with Dell Computer." IBM is quickly expanding its OEM
> business to supply Dell Computer, Compaq, Apple, etc. with main parts such
> as HDDs and displays.
>
> In 1998, sales of IBM's OEM business increased by 18% over the previous
> year to $6.6 billion. If this pace continues, the sales of the parts
> business will exceed those of PCs by the year 2002, reversing the balance
> of power within the company. Currently, no manufacturer has a clear lead
> in terms of compact HDD technology, such that compact HDDs must be much
> more attractive than the PC business, which is dictated by the so-called
> Wintel standard. Hau says, "IBM should sell off its PC business to Dell
> Computer or, if necessary, consign OEM production to Dell."
>
> IBM itself is trying to get out of the traditional PC business. Lou
> Gerstner, CEO of IBM emphasized his ideas in a letter recently sent to
> stockholders, saying "IBM's PC era is coming to an end." With the arrival
> of the network era, the functions of the PC itself have decreased.
> Instead, a variety of terminals, such as digital household electrical
> apparatus, are expected to appear. "Network" links with communication
> circuits and central mainframes are planned.
>
> The departments that can best exploit this scenario are the service
> business for network construction for corporate customers, and advanced
> parts that are incorporated into variety of terminals including PCs. A
> time may soon come when a PC becomes merely a kind of terminal connecting
> to the network. This would greatly lessen the importance of PC production
> for IBM. In such a case, a PC product would better be procured from
> another manufacturer for incorporation into the system. Thus, a time may
> come when "IBM is no longer a PC manufacturer."
>
> Gerstner was installed as CEO in 1993 and displayed his skills at
> rebuilding the giant, when IBM was having problems brought about by
> downsizing. For the past few years, however, a slowdown in the reform has
> been noticeable, with US-based Business Week magazine going as far as to
> say, "Gerstner avoids risks too much in his company management and his
> lineups of so many businesses are like some boring investment trust."
>
> Affects on IBM Japan
>
> Investors take a dim view of IBM's loss-making PC business. If IBM
> decides to restructure its PC business, it will inevitably affect IBM
> Japan, which is central to the development and production of notebook PCs.
> Compaq, which develops, produces, and sells notebook PCs independently
> like IBM, will not be able to disregard IBM's abandoning the building of
> its own machines, and may be forced to follow suit.

>
> An IBM executive says, "Gerstner's target is to maximize profits. He has
> no taboos so far as attaining his target is concerned." Gerstner is said
> to attack while guarding. It is no exaggeration to say that the decision
> that Gerstner will make regarding his company's PC business is one of the
> greatest concerns of the US high-tech industry in 1999.
>