SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chris Carlson who wrote (77549)4/1/1999 11:25:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Chris,

Who's lining up to purchase AMD?

My first choice is Compaq. IBM or Motorola also seem like likely suitors.

Scumbria



To: Chris Carlson who wrote (77549)4/1/1999 11:49:00 AM
From: VICTORIA GATE, MD  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
hold on all your intel stock



To: Chris Carlson who wrote (77549)4/1/1999 12:01:00 PM
From: Paul Fiondella  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
AMD and going bankrupt

AMD has a very risky strategy given their inability to produce chips in volume, but their situation is far better than it was when Intel had Pentiums and AMD had nothing to sell against Pentiums except 486's.

AMD has a core of valuable intellectual property. I would imagine that it would partner before it reached cash bottom. Investors might include CPQ, IBM, or even some companies we can't imagine like LU etc. I'd look for an acquisition only in a recession.

IF AMD went under then INTC would control the MPU market. That is enough to bring in the government to regulate INTC's prices --- like a utility. SUNW does not have a monopoly either in the UNIX or in any other market segment so its prices would not undergo the same scrutiny.

INTC's position is unique. I wish it were less unique. The companies strategy is very manufacturing oriented. It cuts costs of production well but it is not diversified enough. It seems to be trying to apply its chip manufacturing skills to other areas besides MPU's. I see that as a plus. But it also hasn't unyoked itself from the WIntel relationship and image of being a corporate Big Brother bully.

I see the price competition with AMD as a minus.

There is a lot of room for improvement at Intel. Their attitude toward the CPU-ID for starters.



To: Chris Carlson who wrote (77549)4/1/1999 1:26:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Chris - Re: " How could the government legitimately regulate Intel's chip prices and not Sun's?"

Because SUN and McNealy have better "friends" in the government.

Witness what they are doing to Microsoft.

Paul