Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : NP Energy Cp New -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (15560)	4/1/1999 12:42:00 PM
From: Lola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22810

You could be right, I am rechecking the charts and will respond shortly. Lola

To: Win-Lose-Draw who wrote (15560)	4/1/1999 1:22:00 PM
From: Lola	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22810

Ok you are right. It appears that in the last 3 months the average MDIN buyer paid just under 5/16. Time = 3 months and Frequency = quarterly. It's more clear that way. So at 0.29 the average investor would be down less than 10%. That makes more sense. What I find hard to understand is the extremely high total volume in the last 3 months. It's over a 100M shares. How did that happen when all other 9 months total about that much? The MDIN people say it is because shorts have shorted the stock to the max and not because insiders or large shareholders are selling. How can we find proof that this is true. And what if it is not true? Then what? Any ideas? Lola P.S.: an interesting note about the MDIN investors, they do not sound like average Joes who have been sold a stock they know nothing about. Most of them actually sound like they have a clue and are not worried that they are not in a profit situation (i'm sure some of them actually are at a profit). Are these investors "in the know" and the first to see something good or are they something else?