To: Paul Fiondella who wrote (77643 ) 4/3/1999 3:44:00 PM From: billwot Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
Paul-Re: Thus the owner of the productive goods, say Bill Gates, remain in control of the productive asset, Microsoft, even during the most severe depression whereas the owners of shares in Microsoft lose the value of their shares. Microsoft still produces goods and Bill still owns MSFT in any financial collapse. I can only assume that you slept through both econ 101 and corp. fin. 101 the days they explained the concept of ownership of corporations via stock holdings. Bill Gates ownership of MSFT and its productive assets is limited to his share holdings, the same as any other MSFT investor. If the corporation were to fall into liquidation, he would recover the same value per share if any) as any other stockholder. Repeat after me! The shareholders, be they officers or outsiders, are the owners of any corporation After the cleansing, new capital costs less and capital shifts to productive investments again. If the market value of a corporation's share declines, new capital costs more Investors would obviously pay less per unit of ownership, hence the additional capital would come at the cost of a relatively larger share of the "productive assets". Think about it-would MSFT gain a larger capital inflow from the issue of new shares if the market for the new shares was $150, or if they sold for $75 dollars. Greenspan's investment in Treasuries and not stock Since the market rises and falls on how his briefcase looks, and his words cause major market trends, it might be considered a slight conflict of interest if he had equity holdings. Now..., our homework for the weekend ... Have a good holiday billwot