Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NYBellBoy who wrote (26464)	4/2/1999 3:21:00 PM
From: coachbobknight	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

19.9% is a key number for cyoe... though ugly, it is legal to book revenue to companies that you have a stake in... cyoe's problems lay more in disclosure... they didn't disclose comdisco's 5% stake... they didn't disclose beeman's termination<for over a month>... they issued false and misleading statements in their original press release about the sale to crescent...(since the sale was to comdisco not crescent)... they are being watched very closely by the sec, the tsc, and the wall street journal... however, none of this is a guarantee that they will fall... i hope the local LA sec office has indeed been contacted...

To: NYBellBoy who wrote (26464)	4/2/1999 5:06:00 PM
From: StockDung	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

"Has CYOE ever acquired 20% or more of any of these companies, where constructive control could be asserted by the auditors?" I like that. Logical reasoning

To: NYBellBoy who wrote (26464)	4/3/1999 9:40:00 PM
From: Richard Miller	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Well- Another brand new company investment of CYOE in which they buy 19%, and the Restaurant company, Patrizio et al, (which always loses money) but has millions to finance leases for new companies. steps up to the plate for another 7 plus million. Thanks Bellboy, I was wracking my brain to figure out why always 19% , never more. It all makes sense now. Cyoe- connection Scharpat owned by a Patrizio which owns a T-Com resale outfit.. How brazen can you get? BTW why does 30,000 or 40,000 warrants of a stock worth $6.00 secure a $7.6 million leasse. What am I missing?