Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MGV who wrote (10131)	4/3/1999 1:15:00 AM
From: Rich Wolf	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

You're howling at the full moon, dark one. But no one is going to join in with you. We're busy preparing for the feast. You miss the point entirely: with each week, we are closer, not further away, and we know it. You see, we have an advantage: we all met at Henderson, we confirmed what we each needed to know, we have reason for our chosen positions, and most of all, we are united: you are one. Your attempts to stir the pot are futile. So sorry.

To: MGV who wrote (10131)	4/3/1999 1:32:00 AM
From: Pallisard	Respond to of 27311

I'll follow Wolanchuk's advice rather than your's. Comparing his timing to your's, riding MIKL up to 31 and back down to 16, you shouldn't even open your mouth about stock advice to anyone.

To: MGV who wrote (10131)	4/3/1999 10:07:00 AM
From: lws	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Hi, Darkgreen, The brief answer: nope. Am still betting with the smart money. As far as I can tell, the smart money (the board) hasn't changed its mind, so I haven't either. I know I promised to detail my post-Henderson thinking, but am too busy for now, and I figure the argument is not too difficult to construct anyway. There is a need, however, for a discussion of the whole problem of information in Valence-type investments. I have the bits & pieces of such a post, but it will have to wait. Meanwhile, I get a kick out of watching the dither now that the Wexler types have popped up. I am especially charmed by how Wexler is now abetting the putative fraud by not showing all his "cards." You'd think he could at least give us a hint beyond citing the frequency of posts by certain of us bulls and the dark machinations of Wolanchuk. The beat goes on... Regards, lws