Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maryann M who wrote (23453)	4/3/1999 10:34:00 AM
From: The Swordsman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

His view as you call it has been substantially less than honest. He's selectively posted information numerous times in the past that totally distorts what has actually happened. He's lied by omission here too many times in the past. However, he has brought the potential of the worst news to the thread. We were always aware of the potential. Now that we are understanding that Gordon had his back against the wall, does anyone understand the gotchya clause that I uncovered. The one that looks good for the other side but that in truth operates for us. That is if the revenue stream is on time. It's a big if, but knowing what I know I have little doubt that TSIG will make it happen. Just no more surprises. The biggest beef I've got or anyone here should have is the lack of sunshine from RG. It looks like he's been playing in the trenches with pennies too long. With the retaining of Golin Harris he'll have to change his ways. They just won't tolerate his kind of market mechanics, and from what others say, it appears he's smart enough to understand that. He's really accountable now in a material way. Sword.Com

To: Maryann M who wrote (23453)	4/3/1999 11:06:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 44908

Maryann, while I do not think that the question "why are they here" is really relevant, I can explain very simply why I posted here. One of the posters mentioned a post I wrote long time ago on the issue of floorless financing (you can find that post on SI's floorless thread.) Floorless financing has concerned me since the days more than two years ago when it occurred in a stock I started following (AKSEF). As a matter of fact the term floorless financing was coined by me. The issue of floorless financing is not specific to TSIG, it is draining billions of dollars from unsuspecting investors and I have spent an appreciable amount of time on that issue, eventually, the SEC will or should, find a way to outlaw this financial instrument. In the last 30 months, I have warned many holders of stocks in companies that have issued such instruments of the dire consequences these might have. I felt it my civic duty to do that. I can list more than 20 companies that have been decimated in the process and the stockholders left holding equity worth between 1/4 to 1/100 of their original investments at the time I sounded the warnings. As for the comment about IPMCF, I wonder why the author of that ridiculous post did not mention that I was absolutely right about IPMCF, and this company is now bankrupt with many of my cyberfriends holding the bag. Some like many on this thread, were quite upset by my posts, some finally heeded and managed to salvage some of their investment. They are very good cyberfriends by now. If you are really interested in the outcome of floorless financing, go and see the history of companies like CAFE (less than 1/100), EXSO (less than 1/100), CTYS (bankrupt), AKSEF (acquired at the end under BV), IELSF (essentially bankrupt), HEC (worth 1/4 and the bleeding was stopped only after they acquired back the floorless issue), RNTK (worth 1/6 and going), TTRIF (worth 1/25 of the former value and still going), GATE (now finally recovering after the floorless was taken out, but it went from 6 or so to .5 before the floorless was taken out). I have still to see a case were the outcome after the issuance of a floorless instrument was positive. One company, VLNC, might have a positive outcome, and there the floorless issue was "renegotiated" for the time being (it is pending as a future time bomb to come down on July 27, if they do not ship some substantial amount of product out). When you see the field of corporate carcasses that the floorless bandits have left stockholders with, you have a civic responsibility to post a warning to that effect. Fortunately enough, that responsibility ceases in the face of verbal abuse from stock touters and other shills. The issuance of a floorless financing tool is often the beginning of a massive decline in stock holders value followed by reverse splits and massive dilution. You may also want to review a recent article that appeared in the Law Review: ljx.com Respectfully yours, Zeev

To: Maryann M who wrote (23453)	4/3/1999 1:49:00 PM
From: cicak	Respond to of 44908

Very well stated Maryann - <<And, the TSIG.com thread has a team of good folks who have invested in TSIG.com's future -- not the past.>> I agree with you. I made my investment in TSIG.com based on the company's long term prospects. We need to deal with the weak points and as you stated <<research possible solutions, make suggestions, and help protect our investment in a company with great potential.>> By the way - great news for Hawaii yesterday. The TV series Bay Watch is moving to Hawaii (after almost losing out to Australia) and will be named Bay Watch in Hawaii. They'll mainly be filming on the North Shore of Oahu. :~) Regards, phil.com