Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shane Geary who wrote (54083)	4/3/1999 7:19:00 PM
From: Kevin K. Spurway	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1571216

Re: "Intel's certainly appears to be better (and, very important, more consistent)." I'm you'll agree with me that it's easier to achieve the appearance of consistency if you're spreading production out over six to eight fabs. It's also easier to produce marketable quantities of your highest MHz parts at earlier introduction dates (simple math). These two factors contribute to making Intel's process technology look bette than it really is. Kevin