Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Diaminds (Bulls Board) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tomato who wrote (776)	4/3/1999 10:36:00 PM
From: Rocket Red	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1172

Tomato Snap Lake is coming to a Boil. A smell a explosion coming very soon. PS Be sure to Stay Tuned.

To: Tomato who wrote (776)	4/5/1999 1:29:00 AM
From: gg cox	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1172

My high school "trig" is long forgotten and wouldn't know where to find the tables...I measured a door top to bottom ..measured 80 inches...let this represent the true thickness of the dyke....after popping the door off its hinges clamped a carpenters square on the bottom corner of the door so that the bottom of the door was at 15 degrees on the square....set the clamped square and door upright on the level floor ...the door now represents a side view of the dyke dipping at 15 degrees...dropped a "PLUM" line from top of door to bottom and measured the distance...this represents a vertical drill hole which measured 82.25 inches...Willp's calculations of less than 3% variance looks correct to me the old way...I get 2.81% on 80 inches of true thickness. This from wsp's NR of mar 26 "However, the average dip of the kimberlite appears to be about 15 degrees; hence, true thickness at each site is expected to be approximately 90% of reported down-hole thickness. " As Willp and others have stated this 90% figure seems wrong. gg