Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Diaminds (Bulls Board) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gg cox who wrote (780)	4/5/1999 2:49:00 PM
From: WillP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1172

Good grief!!! Well, I don't think you actually "popped the door off it's hinges"...but I can see someone measuring to satisfy themselves as to the mathematics involved. There's a lot to be said for good old fashioned experimentation, isn't there. Funny thing, I bet you weren't alone. The only way the true thickness could have been 90% of indicated thickness, is if the angle was about 26 degrees. That would require the drill holes straying from vertical by 11-15 degrees...always to downdip. That's not too likely, is it. Well done. :-) WillP