Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (33658)	4/4/1999 6:12:00 PM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Welcome back. Where have you been?

To: Ilaine who wrote (33658)	4/6/1999 2:57:00 AM
From: PiMac	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Not meant to ignore you, Cobalt Blue. <<Irreverant thoughts for the day>> was the context CTC provided for my reply. My reply >>Here I thought women Wanted idiots and that That was driving men crazy.<< came from the linguistics, not experience. As a creation of language, there is surely meaning within it, as within the originals. It is unlikely that I would be the best to ... <<Hmmm. Intriguing. Please expand.>> The rough thought I had composing was that women wanted men like themselves, or men they could control as idiots, and later I've come to think that being adored is an act, that which an idiot will allow himself to play. That men are not: women, wishing controlled, or wishing adoration is stressful. As pleasant as these roles are, they end--reality is seen. Then the act and the reality are both payed for, by both.