SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Bid.com International (BIDS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ruyi who wrote (16433)4/5/1999 1:48:00 AM
From: frijo  Respond to of 37507
 
You obviously do not understand the mechanics which drive the markets.

Message 8689793

Another scare tactic before opening bell?Ain't gonna be any cheap
shares around for you to cover.Boy do I feel sorry for you and your shorts.



To: Ruyi who wrote (16433)4/5/1999 2:02:00 AM
From: Denise D  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37507
 
Doug,

Obviously you are in love with eBay. We've discussed this time and time again. eBay is consumer-to-consumer, BII is business-to-consumer and B2B. They are not in the same arena.

Also, I really don't think valuations really have too much to do with what the stock price is or should be. What is really important is supply and demand, and market perception. Investors are looking at BII as a deal in comparison to the other net stocks, with lesser weight on the valuations. They see a cheaper stock with a lot of potential, and lots of room for the price to increase.

The mass market is not ready to apply the same rules to Net stocks as they do to many others. I like the analogy to mining and oil & gas stocks. Perception of upside potential is what is driving the prices up.

Denise.



To: Ruyi who wrote (16433)4/5/1999 7:37:00 AM
From: Mr. Forthright  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 37507
 
<<Did anyone know that the management of BII has sold over 20 million shares at $1.50 in the last 6 months including 10 million as recent as December '98??? So who is right??... >>

Actually, you are wrong.



To: Ruyi who wrote (16433)4/5/1999 8:52:00 AM
From: the Chief  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 37507
 
I wish to get to the bottom of this post dagan. Could you please read this answer, and comment.

Message 8689793

the Chief