Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (49039)	4/5/1999 6:41:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Uh.... yes. (Boy do I feel dumb)

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (49039)	4/5/1999 7:39:00 PM
From: Jan Crawley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

I haven't learned anything Sarmad, don't be frustrated, and don't use any logic right now. If you had lost $200K in Dec/Jan, but have been gaining $100K back in Feb/Mar, then you have learned. That's the beauty of Amzn, the stock price. If you missed the long train, wait for the short, if you missed the short train, wait for the long. For tomorrow, if we have a gap down, i will buy 100 shares to close the box, if gap up...etc...my 100 shares day limit sell target may be $195...

To: Sarmad Y. Hermiz who wrote (49039)	4/6/1999 9:25:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

>> Harvard is cheaper.... For sure. But really, I haven't learned anything. I am totally lost for why the net stocks went up today or last week. I don't see how their business prospects look any better. Even by a tiny little bit. If anything, I think Yahoo spent $7 billion (bcst) for something even more worthless than their current web page. Have you personally ever spent a single penny on anything you saw on an ad banner on yahoo ? Has anyone ? Sarmad, Are you trying to say these stocks are trading close to twice the value of a few weeks ago and the fundamentals have not changed? <G> That would be my assumption...