Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIG.com TIGI (formerly TSIG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Swordsman who wrote (24301)	4/6/1999 3:47:00 PM
From: tfk	Respond to of 44908

Sword, so why are you still here if you don't trust Gordon or believe in his leadership?????? I question your motives here more than Gordon. I don't care how much Gordon get paid or don't get paid as long as he can deliver. So far (from last of 1998 to now) I believe he is delivering and I like what I see. Isn't it under his leadership that he has positioned TSIG with all these deals for explosive revenue and profit growth? If you don't believe in him at this point, GET OUT . tfk

To: The Swordsman who wrote (24301)	4/6/1999 3:47:00 PM
From: ztect	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 44908

Per your own words.... "...I'm not so sure that I can agree. When did Mr. Gordon last have 40% beneficial ownership? That information and the use of certain holdings last year to collateralize a loan which he then made to the company needs to be clearly outlined for all to see and understand. It's truly clouded in very complex wording and timing of events that are anything but precise...." All the more reason to get an explanation before being so prolix. Guess I did have to raise you as an issue again with this following question..... Are you manic depressive? Hypster one week, basher the next, hype, bash...... Though I don't disagree with the gist of your position on compensation, you again are swinging to extremes in the language you choose. This isn't "objectivity".... You haven't spoken with Gordon.... You haven't met the man.... You don't know completely what hasn't been presented to shareholders. Plus by your own admission, the wording of the 10-k is "..very complex wording and timing of events that are anything but precise..." So why don't you get on the phone with Gordon and address these issues to him directly after Marty, or independently from Marty, and report back to the thread what Gordon told you. That would be the less churlish thing to do. Sincerely, z (spelling not checked)