Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nuke44 who wrote (2235)	4/6/1999 9:05:00 PM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 17770

<<As it has been from the start, the power to stop NATO actions lies in Serbia's control and their's alone.(That is of course, as long as Serbia still exists)>> Ive commented on this very point on other boards in response to quite heated Serbian and Russian demonizing of the NATO position. It was within the power of Milosevich to end this from the very beginning. Likewise the Russian and Chinese hypocrites have blood dripping from their hands, as Russia could have put an immediate chill on events by browbeating Milo. The reason, as we both know and some people obviously do not, that NATO has not gone to the UN security council is because any resolution to take action would have been immediately vetoed by Russia and China. At any time during this mess, Milo or the Russians could have ended it. The fact is both had an interest in continuing the crisis. Its a shame that all the blame is being heaped on NATO, or rather, the United States.