SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Newbridge Networks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Techwatch who wrote (10709)4/7/1999 10:48:00 PM
From: Glenn McDougall  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18016
 
TECH STOCKS >> NETWORKING

Ciena Takes a Verbal Swipe at Lucent's Tactics
By Kevin Petrie
Staff Reporter
4/7/99 8:06 PM ET
thestreet.com

Plain English can be a little harsh when you're describing a competitor.

At least when it comes to Ciena's (CIEN:Nasdaq) grudge against Lucent
(LU:NYSE).

In a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission Monday, Ciena, using
the "plain English" now urged by regulators, openly raises the possibility that Lucent
may have been less than truthful in its claims to deliver equipment on time.

This feud goes back to last summer when the Linthicum, Md.-based supplier of
optical-fiber systems was left at the altar by prospective merger partner Tellabs
(TLAB:Nasdaq). Tellabs backed out after AT&T (T:NYSE) canceled a potentially
lucrative contract with Ciena and gave it to Lucent.

Since then, Ciena has raised questions about Lucent's competitive tactics. In an
SEC filing in September, Ciena wrote that it was investigating potentially damaging
and "legally questionable" activities by competitors. Nothing came of that
investigation.

The most recent issue hinges on a Lucent product announcement released in
January 1998. In Monday's 8K filing, Ciena took the unusual step of questioning the
truthfulness of Lucent marketing, this type in sharper language than it's used to
criticize its rival in the past.

"When competitors make early announcements of competing products, our
customers may delay their purchasing decisions, particularly if they believe the truth
of the claimed performance of the announced product, and the time within which it
will be available," the document reads.

"For example, in January, 1998, Lucent announced a proposed high-capacity [dense
wavelength division multiplexing] system which it claimed would handle 400 [gigabits
per second] of capacity per fiber, and which it further claimed would be commercially
available worldwide in the fourth quarter of 1998."

The document leaves the rest unsaid: that Lucent made its products commercially
available on April 1, three months behind its prediction in the press release. A Lucent
official says it was ahead of schedule in delivering product to AT&T and other
unnamed customers; already 13 carriers have received shipments.

A Ciena official says Monday's documents simply restate the content of prior filings.
But observers say Ciena's word choice breaks with protocol.

"I can't say that I've ever seen anyone take this blatant a swipe at a competitor in this
way before," says one securities attorney, who asked not to be named.

"It signals that there may be some friction," says Mort Cohen, chairman of Clarion
Partners, which isn't an investor in Ciena or Lucent. "It's a red flag."

But you have to score a few extra points for candor.

"That's a great example of plain English," says analyst Kevin Slocum with
SoundView, adding that Ciena's version of the episode was accurate. Slocum rates
the stock a hold; his firm has no banking relationship with Ciena.

Ciena started a technological race in 1996 when it shipped the first system capable
of packing 16 "channels" of light onto an optical fiber, offering phone companies a
way to ease network capacity strains. Lucent, Alcatel (ALA:NYSE) and other
established telecom suppliers hustled to match the upstart.

Ciena quickly scaled to 40 channels, but its stock plunged the day Lucent
announced an 80-channel product in January 1998.

Lucent says its announcement of the 80-channel product caused no disruption in the
optical industry. But Slocum and other industry experts say it used a strategy long
practiced by the likes of IBM (IBM:NYSE): "freezing" a market, or announcing a
product long before it is ready. The intention is to convince customers not to flock to
a competitor's offering.

Ciena has a complicated relationship with Lucent, because it is the sole supplier of
two chips used in Ciena's optical products. Ciena relies on other rivals such as
Alcatel and Nortel (NT:NYSE) for laser components. Mike Margolies, president of
the independent analyst shop Avalon Research, says Ciena might stress that
relationship by sniping at it in SEC documents.

"The competitive risk is that there's obviously increased hostility or noise between
these two companies," says Margolies, who recommends selling Ciena shares.