SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (54627)4/7/1999 8:12:00 PM
From: RDM  Respond to of 1577010
 
If the floating performance is truly the same as the Pentium III without a tweaked compiler the K7 may really be able to perform quite well(1.5X to 2.0X) with a specially compiled code. Keeping the execution units fed is key to the higher FPU performance and this requires compiler modification for the last level of tweak.



To: Elmer who wrote (54627)4/7/1999 8:12:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577010
 
Elmer - RE: "Plus AMD's admission last week that the Kmart-7 won't be able to compete with Coppermine leaves it on the midrange desktop for Q3."

Why should AMD say their unreleased processor is faster than another company's unreleased processor?

Since Intel hasn't said anything about McKinley and the 21364, and using your sick interpretation, Intel has admitted McKinley won't be able to compete with the 21364.



To: Elmer who wrote (54627)4/7/1999 8:38:00 PM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577010
 
Elmer,

The fact that piece of silicon executes x86 code tells you very little about what parts of the chip are functional.

Scumbria