Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PanAmerican BanCorp (PABN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ERRAFF who wrote (31325)	4/8/1999 5:52:00 PM
From: J T	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 43774

It's INSINUATION...INNUENDO...IMPLICATION...(if NOT TRUE...LOW) All rolled up in one! And how many times has she accused the "longs" of such "childish" and "low" ATTACKS! Well colleenb lets see the PROOF! JT

To: ERRAFF who wrote (31325)	4/8/1999 6:15:00 PM
From: LegalBeast	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 43774

<<<< Legal, what's your take on this? >>>> Well, it sure sounds liblous to me if it is not true. Hmmmmm ... lets see here ... she said that she had not asked John about his "failed marriage". For that claim to be true, there MUST be a failed marriage to ask about in the first place. Surely there must be proof since she plainly states it as FACT! I really don't think John will waste his time or money on the shameful likes of her, so it is probably well enough that she be convicted yet again right here for all the world to read about.