SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jach who wrote (24252)4/9/1999 5:22:00 AM
From: Curtis E. Bemis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77397
 
I notice you are pretty good at Multicasting--You have all threads
covered. I also note that multicasting is one-way for you and your
opinions and advice are liked and heeded on the other threads about as
much as they are on this one. Good job



To: jach who wrote (24252)4/9/1999 5:33:00 PM
From: ftmp  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77397
 
good call jach, buy compaq and get half of your money back!



To: jach who wrote (24252)4/9/1999 9:34:00 PM
From: Byron Xiao  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77397
 
Can you say growth? The growth of these 3 companies, CPQ, HWP and SUNW don't equal to CSCO. That's the reason the street values CSCO at such a high premium. Now, about whether to own the other 3 vs. CSCO, I would probably go with the other 3 companies. I don't think too much of CPQ, never like that DEC acquisition they did last year. HWP got a terrible execution track record. But SUNW would be a stock that I would love to own.

In my humble opinion, both CSCO and SUNW are the premium "Internet Infrastructure" play, they are much better and safer than the Internet pure play. Out of this two, CSCO has a higher growth, but SUNW might not lack behind, because almost all of its values are only in its servers business. They are expending their horizons in E-Commerce, Home Electronics with Java, Enterprise storage, future alliance with INTC to strategically port Solaris onto native Intel architecture, introducing SUN PCI card to run NT / Solaris application seemlessly on the same Solaris box. Plus, their Solaris system is way more reliable, scalable than the much delayed Windows 2000. And they are entering into the sub $5000 servers world. I see a lot of good things happening in SUNW and that's why my pre-split price of $39/share of SUNW almost quadriple in less than a year. And it still has a long way to go up. SUNW is the primary reason I would want to own the other 3 vs. CSCO.



To: jach who wrote (24252)4/10/1999 2:24:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit  Respond to of 77397
 
simple reason, ...

For once, a proper characterization. For a more complex and fruitful answer you might think about where earnings will be in say 10 years. And if you want to get really sophisticated you might look to things like disposable cash flow.

But as the man said,"For every difficult a complex problem there is always a simple answer. And it is always wrong."

TTFN,
CTC