Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Habib who wrote (23844)	4/9/1999 5:00:00 PM
From: FruJu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 213182

>On a separate issue, did anyone notice that Appleinsider on their >Sonata report indicated OS X would be released early next year? A >mistake or use of fiscal calendar? Or is OS X delayed? I personally expect OS X (client version) to be delayed at least into next year, possibly even as late as the 2000 WWDC. Why? Because Apple has, in their infinite loop wisdom, been completely silent on seeding the vital portion of OS X, namely the Carbon libraries, to third party developers. If you'll recall the 1998 WWDC, Apple promised to have a "beta" of Mac OS X (and no, they didn't mean OS X Server) shipping by Q1 1999. From what I've heard, OS X has a quite different user interface to that of OS X Server, and will need a lot of fine-tuning, testing, to get it to run with the ease of use which OS 8.5 users are accustomed to... I just don't see them being able to do this in 8 months, given the state things currently seem to be at. Of course, Steve Jobs could spring his usual big surprise at WWDC, and actually ship a beta version complete with Carbon libraries, but I'm not holding my breath.