Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scott Wheeler who wrote (10089)	4/10/1999 4:35:00 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14226

Scott: <<If I judged by your last post alone, I'd say that accusing EF of deliberately writing misleading letters to other Global stockholders was ignorant and unfair.>> Show me where I accused Ed of anything? I simply pointed out that his criticism of me for "misleading comments" could far more easily be applied to his posts. I have never claimed any knowledge about this company other than what is publicly available. In the post I cited, he claimed to have knowledge of "fundamental events occuring as we speak" that would result in a "share price bonanza." Stating an opinion one way or another is one thing. Claims of knowledge of fundamental events is quite another. You be the judge as to which is "misleading." <<Can you look back over your past posts and show us when you've had anything to say that wasn't disagreeable and fractious?>> I can find plenty, Mr. Wheeler. Unfortunately you have to go back a few years before "Wolf" was cried once to many times by this company and the other desert dirts. Here is one example. Message 956152 <<some of us will be "winners" and some "losers" in the game of intelligent hindsight.>> The exchange of posts between Ed and I in March 1998 were not hindsight at the time they were made. Ed was predicting a "share price bonanza." I said I saw no hurry to jump in. Whose foresight in March 1998 proved to be correct? <<I vote for respect for differences of opinion - what do you vote for?>> Gee Scott, the only reason why I even bothered to make my previous post was because Ed didn't seem to have much respect for my difference of opinion. The words "carping and belching" comes to mind. Can you find such insulting words that I have used in regards to Mr. Fishbaine? Maybe your respect for differences of opinion only applies to those who agree with you?