Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rudedog who wrote (56900)	4/11/1999 10:50:00 AM
From: Captain Jack	Respond to of 97611

rudedog--- I hope a large percentage of that time ep and em spent with the board was explaining their severence. The strangest part of all the AV discussion no one has brought up is if they were to spin it off it would command a higher price than CPQ PRIOR to the opening tomorrow,,, seems like they want to wait until the inut bubble bursts to put it out,,, or maybe they just burst the bubble Fri---

To: rudedog who wrote (56900)	4/11/1999 3:11:00 PM
From: JRI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Rude- If She-x is right, then the BOD really should can Pfeiffer and Mason immediately, given that they were not going to say anything until earnings..that would have meant even more lawsuits, and further validity to all "head up the a## theorists" and general gross incompetence claims... Inexcusable, given the past year. My point about she-x: She may, indeed, be someone at Compaq with access to information and an intelligent poster at that, but the fact is also that she was fairly confident that Compaq had made the quarter (due to a blockbuster March)...and she was way off.. After that call, how can anyone have full (any) confidence on her (supposedly superior) information? Looks like you are better off using other sources. JIMHO.