Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Bob who wrote (4979)	4/11/1999 9:58:00 PM
From: Jenna	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 32873

I find it wholly objectionable that SI Admin allow this person to write things like "Shark and Sharkess' about two of your most popular posters and calling his thread a 'rough thread' and hers a 'normal' thread.. I can't speak for TMex but I object to the term Sharkess and I want that post removed immediately. I did not know about this post but it was e-mailed to me by a third and fourth party who happen to be influencial in the financial media. If this post is not removed than I see it as a 'free pass' for all to post derogatory remarks on all occasions, and I will address my objection publicly through other media. I find it hilarious and ironic that I have spent 2 years building up the most popular thread on SI with almost every post a 'professionally put together stock tip or analysis' never a complaining post on SI in 2 years, have to come to come SI for such a poster. Message 8806339 It is not the first occasion this poster has knocked a thread that is not bothering her or making any reference to her whatsover. There has been many complaining posts attributed to her (and I can document them on request) and the result was that she went from the "complaining thread" onto another. Granted SI is a free forum but why you would allow derogatory terms addressed to your most popular posters is beyond me. jenna market gems

To: SI Bob who wrote (4979)	4/16/1999 6:06:00 PM
From: jas cooper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32873

Hi Bob, Last week, as I'm sure you know, an SI member posted a link to a phony Bloomberg site that he had found on Yahoo. I understand he has since been named in a lawsuit. Since he hasn't posted since that day, I'm wondering if he's OK. We all spend so much time attending to our greed, we often neglect those who innocently attempt to assist us. Are you aware of the status of William Vu, or others from SI who may have been named, and how we can lend our support, if needed? Thanks, James

To: SI Bob who wrote (4979)	5/1/1999 7:40:00 PM
From: accountclosed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32873

a chain letter thread. Subject 27990

To: SI Bob who wrote (4979)	5/1/1999 11:28:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 32873

I saw Emil Vidrine on the "feelies" thread. Nothing could hide that putrid stench. I want you to explain to me why his hate-filled bigotry falls within SI's guidelines. I want you to explain to me why these kinds of vicious, racist attacks are permissible. Why, SI Admin Bob, is this piece of filth given a forum? Can you explain this to me SI Admin Bob? And don't tell me that you see nothing anti-Semitic or racist in this stuff, because that would be an insult to either my intelligence or yours depending on how charitable I am. CTC