Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Bid.com International (BIDS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ruyi who wrote (21722)	4/17/1999 2:34:00 PM
From: CBurnett	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37507

Dagan seriously sir, you just don't get it.You must factor the inflationary hype for internet stocks.

To: Ruyi who wrote (21722)	4/17/1999 2:43:00 PM
From: Dave Kiernan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37507

Someone likes BII, of course Zacks is a US company..... How dare they recommend a TSE 300 stock as a strong buy. Only in Canada you say,pity! funds.cnnfn.com

To: Ruyi who wrote (21722)	4/17/1999 2:43:00 PM
From: CBurnett	Respond to of 37507

Dagan I am in this business to make money. I don't care about whats crazy or ridiculous about an INUT company. I see an internet stock accumulating I buy it up....the longer the accumulation the more desperate the market to move the price. These markets must move to survive.This era won't last forever just like the real estate boom in the eighties. You have been barking up thew wrong tree for months.Let it be and flow with the market.Take a picnic lunch in the park and stop trying to convince us about the impending madness.

To: Ruyi who wrote (21722)	4/17/1999 2:51:00 PM
From: DrReality	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 37507

Rumors only remain rumors until either substantiated, or discredited. As far as anyone is concerned, Dagan, your spewing over the last few weeks has all been rumors. You have been the epitomy of "pot stirring". Just because a couple of your predictions came true, you are not as good as you may think. If anyone wants to see how intelligent you and your comments are: plot a intra-day graph of the stocks performance during the day and compare it with the times Dagan and his obnoxious crew show up and start posting. The frequency of their posts would surely rise during periods with no action, or no news. I would count on this trend more than your information.

To: Ruyi who wrote (21722)	4/17/1999 4:40:00 PM
From: F. Evans	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37507

Dagan...don't forget to mention the phony rumours that failed to propel the stock upwards....my sources at the brokerage house indicates that on Thursday morning, the big rumour was that Godin had received notice from the SEC that they would not trade on Nasdaq...that one was soon shot down after someone in the brokerage confirmed the time lines in the rumour did not jive....also, the filing on Thursday was evidence that that was not true...so just as there are rumours propelling stocks upwards there are those that keep it from going up. Frank

To: Ruyi who wrote (21722)	4/17/1999 4:56:00 PM
From: donkeyman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37507

Dagan why do you bring up this bit about management selling a few shares of Bid.com at $7.00/share? Doesn't one of the key management you refer to hold a million shares of Bid.com? The few that he sold was insignificant - I'd say 0.0001%. I'd say the few that he sold wouldn't pay the debt in a good poker game. All CEO's were doing that sort of thing as their company stocks grew into the 100's, including Bill Gates. You were attacking Bid.com 30 posts a day when it was $3.00 per share and you were attacking 30 posts a day when it was $30.00 a share and I suspect if it ever reaches $300.00 per share down the road you will still be attacking the company. I think there's more to you and Bid.com than meets the eye.